An astounding video uncovered from the archives today shows the BBC reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. The incredible footage shows BBC reporter Jane Standley talking about the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building while it remains standing in the live shot behind her head. How did the BBC know that it was going to collapse? And why did they report the collapse when it is clearly standing in the background
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
Monday, February 19, 2007
Making Sense of 9/11/01:Features WTC Towers Demolition /US Illegal Opium Trade
Excepts from 911 Guilt: The Proof Is In Your Hands, a DVD produced by Don Paul, Jim Hoffman and Celestine Star.
'Making Sense of 9/11/01: Features of Demolition of the World Trade Center's Twin Towers / Opium from Afghanistan as Fundamental to the World's Illegal and Legal Economies'.
A dvd produced by Don Paul, Jim Hoffman and Celestine Star, About a August 2005 presentation to the Los Angeles Citizens' Grand Jury on the Crimes of September 11, 2001 Part I-A 'Systematic Destruction is the Only Explanation: Jim Hoffman on Blast Waves, Demolition Squibs, Straight-down Symmetry, Dust Clouds and Molten Metal as Features of Demolition of the World Trade Center Twin Towers' Part 1-B 'Opium from Afghanistan as Fundamental to the Crimes of 9/11/01: Don Paul on How $180 Million in Illegal Narcotics Makes for $3.6 trillion on Stock Markets'
Friday, February 16, 2007
Guns Drugs Fraud BCCI Afghanistan (#33)
Clark Clifford, the author of the 1947 NSA act that created the National Security State is caught working with the pakistani ISI and the Taliban in the mother of all drug, gun, oil, bank frauds.
As always, we ask our audience to please cross-check the information presented in this video.
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
This is an insightful probe into the tiny clique who have been exercising extraordinary power over US policy, both foreign and domestic. These people pose a clear and present danger to the Constitution of the United States of America. Their greatest advantage is that their views and objectives are so contrary to traditional American values that even those who consider themselves to be "Liberal" do not grasp the gravity of the danger these people pose to the democratic republic of the United States of America.
Friday, February 09, 2007
Thursday, February 01, 2007
We now stand ten years past the midpoint of a century that has witnessed four major wars among great nations. Three of these involved our own country. Despite these holocausts America is today the strongest, the most influential and most productive nation in the world. Understandably proud of this pre-eminence, we yet realize that America's leadership and prestige depend, not merely upon our unmatched material progress, riches and military strength, but on how we use our power in the interests of world peace and human betterment.
A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.
Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peace time, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.
Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.
This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence-economic, political, even spiritual-is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.
Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.
In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.
Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been over shadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.
The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.
Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.
It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system-ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.