Friday, November 30, 2007

Originator of "No Plane hit Pentagon" frustrated: can't walk through wall!

Yet another post rejected by 911blogger

General Stubblebine is confounded by his continual failure to walk through his wall. What's wrong with him that he can't do it? Maybe there's simply too much in his in-tray for him to give it the requisite level of concentration. There's no doubt in his mind that the ability to pass through objects will one day be a common tool in the intelligence.

General Stubblebine's contribution to 9/11 Truth:


Chapter One: The General

This is a true story. It is the summer of 1983. Major General Albert Stubblebine III is sitting behind his desk in Arlington, Virginia, and he is staring at his wall, upon which hang his numerous military awards. They detail a long and distinguished career. He is the United States Army's chief of intelligence, with sixteen thousand soldiers under his command. He controls the army's signals intelligence, their photographic and technical intelligence, their numerous covert counterintelligence units, and their secret military spying units, which are scattered throughout the world. He would be in charge of the prisoner-of-war interrogations too, except this is 1983, and the war is cold, not hot.

He looks past his awards to the wall itself. There is something he feels he needs to do even though the thought of it frightens him. He thinks about the choice he has to make. He can stay in his office or he can go into the next office. That is his choice. And he has made it.

He is going into the next office.

... His responsibilities being what they are, he knows he ought to have his own man at his side in case anything goes wrong during his journey into the next office.

Even so, he doesn't call for his assistant, Command Sergeant George Howell. This is something he feels he must do alone.

Am I ready? he thinks. Yes, I am ready.

He stands up, moves out from behind his desk, and begins to walk.

I mean, he thinks, what is the atom mostly made up of anyway? Space!

He quickens his pace.

What am I mostly made up of? he thinks. Atoms!

He is almost at a jog now.

What is the wall mostly made up of? he thinks. Atoms! All I have to do is merge the spaces. The wall is an illusion. What is destiny? Am I destined to stay in this room? Ha, no!

Then General Stubblebine bangs his nose hard on the wall of his office.

Damn, he thinks.

General Stubblebine is confounded by his continual failure to walk through his wall. What's wrong with him that he can't do it? Maybe there is simply too much in his in-tray for him to give it the requisite level of concentration. There is no doubt in his mind that the ability to pass through objects will one day be a common tool in the intelligence-gathering arsenal. And when that happens, well, is it too naive to believe it would herald the dawning of a world without war? Who would want to screw around with an army that could do that? General Stubblebine, like many of his contemporaries, is still extremely bruised by his memories of Vietnam.

These powers are attainable, so the only question is, by whom? Who in the military is already geared toward this kind of thing? Which section of the army is trained to operate at the peak of their physical and mental capabilities?

And then the answer comes to him.

Special Forces!

This is why, in the late summer of 1983, General Stubblebine flies down to Fort Bragg, in North Carolina.

Fort Bragg is vast — a town guarded by armed soldiers, with a mall, a cinema, restaurants, golf courses, hotels, swimming pools, riding stables, and accommodations for forty-five thousand soldiers and their families. The general drives past these places on his way to the Special Forces Command Center. This is not the kind of thing you take into the mess hall. This is for Special Forces and nobody else. Still, he's afraid. What is he about to unleash?

In the Special Forces Command Center, the general decides to start soft. "I'm coming down here with an idea," he begins.

The Special Forces commanders nod.

"If you have a unit operating outside the protection of mainline units, what happens if somebody gets hurt?" he says. "What happens if somebody gets wounded? How do you deal with that?"

He surveys the blank faces around the room.

"Psychic healing!" he says.

There is a silence.

"This is what we're talking about," says the general, pointing to his head. "If you use your mind to heal, you can probably come out with your whole team alive and intact. You won't have to leave anyone behind." He pauses, then adds, "Protect the unit structure by hands-off and hands-on healing!"

The Special Forces commanders don't look particularly interested in psychic healing.

"Okay," says General Stubblebine. The reception he's getting is really quite chilly. "Wouldn't it be a neat idea if you could teach somebody to do this?"

General Stubblebine rifles through his bag and produces, with a flourish, bent cutlery.

"What if you could do this?" says General Stubblebine. "Would you be interested?"

There is a silence.

General Stubblebine finds himself beginning to stammer a little. They're looking at me as if I'm nuts, he thinks. I am not presenting this correctly.

He glances anxiously at the clock.

"Let's talk about time!" he says. "What would happen if time is not an instant? What if time has an X-axis, a Y-axis, and a Z-axis? What if time is not a point but a space? At any particular time we can be anywhere in that space! Is the space confined to the ceiling of this room, or is the space twenty million miles?" The general laughs. "Physicists go nuts when I say this!"

Silence. He tries again.

"Animals!" says General Stubblebine.

The Special Forces commanders glance at one another.

"Stopping the hearts of animals," he continues.

"Bursting the hearts of animals. This is the idea I'm coming in with. You have access to animals, right?"

"Uh," say Special Forces. "Not really..."


"To tell you the truth, Jon," he said, "I've pretty much blocked the rest of the conversation I had with Special Forces out of my head. Whoa, yeah. I've scrubbed it from my mind! I walked away. I left with my tail between my legs."

He paused, and looked at the wall.

"You know," he said, "I really thought they were great ideas. I still do. I just haven't figured out how my space can fit through that space. I simply kept bumping my nose. I couldn't...No. Couldn't is the wrong word. I never got myself to the right state of mind." He sighed. "If you really want to know, it's a disappointment. Same with the levitation."

Some nights, in Arlington, Virginia, after the general's first wife, Geraldine, had gone to bed, he would lie down on his living-room carpet and try to levitate.

"And I failed totally. I could not get my fat ass off the ground, excuse my language. But I still think they were great ideas. And do you know why?"

"Why?" I asked.

"Because you cannot afford to get stale in the intelligence world," he said. "You cannot afford to miss something. You don't believe that? Take a look at terrorists who went to flying schools to learn how to take off but not how to land. And where did that information get lost? You cannot afford to miss something when you're talking about the intelligence world."

There was something about the general's trip to Fort Bragg that neither of us knew the day we met. It was a piece of information that would soon lead me into what must be among the most whacked-out corners of George W. Bush's War on Terror.

What the general didn't know — what Special Forces kept secret from him — was that they actually considered his ideas to be excellent ones. Furthermore, as he proposed his clandestine animal-heart-bursting program and they told him that they didn't have access to animals, they were concealing the fact that there were a hundred goats in a shed just a few yards down the road.

The existence of these hundred goats was known only to a select few Special Forces insiders. The covert nature of the goats was helped by the fact that they had been de-bleated; they were just standing there, their mouths opening and closing, with no bleat coming out. Many of them also had their legs bandaged in plaster.

This is the story of those goats.

read more | digg story

Usama bin Laden's 9/11 Conspiracy Theory

I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and ...

read more | digg story

Pilot who flew 9/11 planes: "I don't believe it's possible"

Former Air Force fighter pilot Russ Wittenberg, who flew over 100 combat missions in Vietnam, sat in the cockpit for Pan Am and United for over 30 years, and previously flew two of the actual airplanes that were allegedly hijacked on 9/11 (United Airlines Flight 175 & 93), does not believe the government's official 9/11 conspiracy theory...

I flew the two actual aircraft which were involved in 9/11... Fight number 175 and Flight 93, the 757 that allegedly went down in Shanksville and Flight 175 is the aircraft that's alleged to have hit the South Tower. I don't believe it's possible for... a so-called terrorist to train on a 172, then jump in a cockpit of a 757-767 class cockpit, and vertical navigate the aircraft, lateral navigate the aircraft, and fly the airplane at speeds exceeding it's design limit speed by well over 100 knots, make high-speed high-banked turns,.. pulling probably 5, 6, 7 G's... I couldn't do it and I'm absolutely positive they couldn't do it. ~ Russ Wittenberg

digg story

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Manufactured "Insurgency" in Iraq, Courtesy of SAS, Aired on BBC once

A BBC report of British SAS intelligence officers who were captured wearing Arab disguises, shooting into crowds, with lots of weapons. The Insurgency in Iraq, much like the rest of the "global war on terrorism", is being fueled, fomented, and funded by Western Intelligence agencies.

digg story

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

September 11th 1973: Where was Heinz?

A short address from a woman talking about the brutality and terror wrought upon other parts of the world by US covert and overt aggression. The truly significant theme which see barely touches upon is that in virtually every instance, I believe we can find the hand of Heinz. What happened in Chili may be heading to your town soon. Where's Heinz?

read more | digg story

Monday, November 26, 2007

Glaring Proof of Something Hotter than an Office Fire in WTC2

I challenge anybody to reproduce the recorded phenomenon of brightly glowing molten metal (or any other material exhibiting a similar appearance) using only materials and conditions reasonably present in World Trade Center Building 2 (WTC2) without assuming the presence of some intentionally placed pyrotechnic material such as thermate.

read more | digg story

Security Intelligence Technologies Inc: Company Description

RC signal "bomb" jamming equipment, eavesdropping technology, wiretap and bug detectors, voice stress lie detector technology, encryption technology, voice logging. SITG is important not only because of the services they provide, but also because they are directly tied to Michale D. Farkas

read more | digg story

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Germar Rudolf sentenced to 30 months in prison

Article 19. Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

read more | digg story

Germar Rudolf imprisoned for Holocaust Heresy

33 Then Pilate entered into the judgment hall again, and called Jesus, and said unto him, Art thou the King of the Jews?

34 Jesus answered him, Sayest thou this thing of thyself, or did others tell it thee of me?

35 Pilate answered, Am I a Jew? Thine own nation and the chief priests have delivered thee unto me: what hast thou done?

36 Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

37 Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus answered, Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice.

38 Pilate saith unto him, What is truth? And when he had said this, he went out again unto the Jews, and saith unto them, I find in him no fault at all.

39 But ye have a custom, that I should release unto you one at the passover: will ye therefore that I release unto you the King of the Jews?

40 Then cried they all again, saying, Not this man, but Barabbas. Now Barabbas was a robber.

digg story

German Holocaust Denier Imprisoned for Inciting Racial Hatred

A German court sentenced Holocaust denier Germar Rudolf to two and a half years in prison for inciting racial hatred in publications and Web sites which "systematically" called into question the Nazi genocide.

The court in Mannheim in southern Germany on Thursday found that Rudolf, 42, had contested the murder of six million Jews in Europe during World War II in propaganda on the Internet and in various publications.

Rudolf, a trained chemist who once worked at the renowned Max Planck Institute in Stuttgart, described the Holocaust as "a gigantic fraud" during his trial. He published pseudo-scientific claims that it was impossible that Zyklon-B poison was used in the gas chambers at the Nazis' Auschwitz death camp.

He also said that he had found no evidence that the gas chambers used to kill hundreds of thousands of Jews ever existed.

Deportation after escape to US

Rudolf fled from Germany to the United States in 1995 after a court handed him a suspended sentence of 14 months for whipping up anti-Semitic sentiment.

He applied for political asylum in the US in 2000, but was rejected. He was deported in 2005 to serve the 1995 sentence. Rudolf was arrested when he appeared at an immigration office in Chicago to apply for a green card based on his marriage to a US citizen.

He was charged again in April 2006 with "systematically" denying or playing down the Nazi genocide of Europe's Jews in documents and on the Internet and of stirring anti-Semitic hatred.

"He presented the Holocaust as invention," prosecutor Andreas Grossmann told the court in his closing speech.

Conviction follows that of associate Zündel

Rudolf's conviction follows that of neo-Nazi "historian" Ernst Zündel, one of the leading figures in the Holocaust denial movement and an acquaintance of Rudolf's, in February.

Zündel was jailed for five years in jail for his books and Web sites which contained fulsome praise of Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler and abuse towards Jews.

Don Henley - "Inside Job" 9/11 truth

While you were sleeping
They came and took it all away
The lanes and the meadows
The places where you used to play

It was an inside job
By the well-connected
Your little protest
Summarily rejected

It was an inside job
Like it always is
Chalk it up to business as usual

While we are dreaming
This little island disappears
While you are looking the other way
Theyll take your right to own your own ideas

And its an inside job
Favors collected
Your trusted servants
Have left you unprotected

It was an inside job
Like it always is
Just chalk it up
To business as usual

You think that youre so smart
But you dont have a fucking clue
What those men up in the towers
Are doing to me and you
And theyll keep doin it and doin it
And doin it and doin it
And doin it and doin it
And doin it and doin it
Until we all wake up
Wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up

I know what Ive done wrong
I am acquainted with the night
I know how hard it is
To always walk out in the light

And its an inside job
To learn about forgiving
Its an inside job
To hang on to the joy of living

They know the road by which you came
They know your mothers maiden name
And what you had for breakfast
And what youve hidden in the mattress

Insect politics
Indifferent universe
Bang your head against the wall
But apathy is worse

Its an inside job
Its an inside job
Its an inside job
Yeh, yeah

Its an inside job
Its an inside job
Its an inside job
Its an inside job

Its an inside job
Its an inside job

PNAC's Imperial Manual

Observe that the author of the following review, Thomas Donnelly, is also the primary author of the infamous Rebuilding America's Defenses, and that Max Boot, the author of the book under review, is an officially acknowledged supporter of the current Bush administration's aggressive belligerence. The review is hosted by Foreign Affairs Magazine a publication of the oligarchic and malignant Council on Foreign Relations.

Years ago, when we first heard rumblings of "Neocon" imperialism, we mistakenly dismissed these as mere partisan hyperbolae. We have since been forced to conclude that such dire warnings had much basis in fact. This is not to say that we embrace the officially sanctioned "Liberal" opposition. That party is merely a different tentacle of the same malevolent chameleon octopus.

The Past as Prologue: An Imperial Manual

Thomas Donnelly
From Foreign Affairs, July/August 2002

The Savage Wars of Peace: Small Wars and the Rise of American Power. Max Boot Basic Books, 2002, 448 pp. $30.00.

Summary: Max Boot's history of America's small wars shows that the republic actually has a long, underappreciated imperial past. It offers lessons for the new Pax Americana and a call not to retreat from policing the imperial frontier.

Thomas Donnelly is Deputy Executive Director of the Project for the New American Century.

The fact of American empire is hardly debated these days. Even those who fear and oppose it (in this country, the libertarian right and the remnants of the new left; abroad, a variety of voices from Paris to Baghdad to Beijing) define international politics almost entirely in relation to U.S. power -- and especially U.S. military power. The "unipolar moment" has become a unipolar decade and, with a little effort and a little wisdom, could last much longer. Even Yale historian Paul Kennedy, who in the mid-1980s predicted U.S. "imperial overstretch," has become a believer. Stunned by the initial success of the war in Afghanistan, he wrote in February,

Nothing has ever existed like this disparity of power; nothing. The Pax Britannica was run on the cheap. Britain's army was much smaller than European armies and even the Royal Navy was equal only to the next two navies -- right now all the other navies in the world combined could not dent American maritime supremacy. Napoleon's France and Philip II's Spain had powerful foes and were part of a multipolar system. Charlemagne's Empire was merely western European in its stretch. The Roman Empire stretched further afield, but there was another great empire in Persia and a larger one in China. There is no comparison.

To be sure, it is still inflammatory to speak openly of empire -- hence the prevalence of euphemisms such as hegemony, preeminence, primacy, sole superpower, or, a la the French, hyperpuissance. But many of the nation's founders would not be so shocked: Alexander Hamilton, writing the first paragraph of the first Federalist Paper, described America as "an empire in many respects the most interesting in the world." Thomas Jefferson's term was "empire of liberty."

Since September 11, President George W. Bush, too, has learned that it is hard to be a humble hegemon. During the 2000 election campaign, Bush's advisers spoke contemptuously of the Clinton administration's promiscuous "engagement" in "nation building" and other "international social work," and they derided Secretary of State Madeleine Albright's claim that the United States was "the indispensable nation." But now that he is fighting a war on terrorism, the president asserts that "no nation is exempt" from the "true and unchanging" American principles of liberty and justice. He sees adherence to these principles as a "non-negotiable demand" that forms the "greater objective" of the war. The Bush Doctrine is thus an expression of the president's decision to preserve and extend Pax Americana throughout the Middle East and beyond.

But a doctrine does not a strategy make. Since the end of the Cold War, U.S. foreign policy has been driven by short-term tactics and politics (both international and domestic). Even in the war on terrorism, the Bush administration has been reluctant to accept any link between one problem and another. Afghanistan, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Iraq, radical Islamism -- all have been dealt with discretely rather than as part of a larger regional approach.

[... continued ...]

Sunday, November 18, 2007

Crimes of Mena: GRAY MONEY - Where Was Heinz?

Activists attempted to expose pervasive and pernicious corruption surrounding the Mena Arkansas cocaine smuggling operation involving George H. W. Bush as well as Bill & Hillary Clinton during the 1980s. A significant aspects is the involvement of AIG, which points to Kissinger and Greenberg. BCCI points to James R. Bath of Arbusto infamy.

read more | digg story

Saturday, November 17, 2007

Ideological Bigotry on the Internet

Haeresis est maxima, holocaustum non credere

This blog entry is being created in order to list those Internet sites which we believe clearly demonstrate an irrational and intolerant bias against people who espouse views different from their own. We are doing this specifically because several months ago we chose to acquiesce to the expectations of the moderators of the forum at by removing all references to such sites as in order that members might link to our blog without fear of being banned. We have since decided against subordinating ourselves to such intellectual tyranny. Instead, we intend to identify the offenders so that others might be aware of their offenses.

We do not intend to bait or provoke individuals into such actions, and we intend, as always, to attempt reasonable dialog. Such can be exceedingly challenging in the face of the frequent abusive vitriol exhibited by those who refuse to allow for difference of opinion or who refuse to consider ideas which challenge their views.

We understand that different individuals will exhibit similar behavior for different underlying reasons. Sometimes reactions are a result of having been conditioned to believe certain things which have been accepted uncritically. With such conditioning there is typically a significant emotional element and an associated reflexive behavior. Such conditioned responses are established as part of our social conditioning, and are sometimes intentionally instilled in the population in what can rightfully be called intentional brainwashing. Ideally we should overcome such inappropriate reactive conditioning. It is part of the nature of the human psyche to be susceptible to such manipulation, so it should be accorded a fair degree of sympathy even though the reflexive behavior is arguably wrong at face value.

In other cases people will feign indignation when they encounter ideas contrary to the prevailing dogma, even though they, themselves, do not believe the dogma. Such people are cognizant enforcers of the dogma, and therefore must be viewed as fully accountable for their conduct. Within this category there is a division between those who inwardly oppose the dogmatic tyranny but who perceive it to be desirable to play along, and the willing enforcers who benefit directly from the deception. This final category, the active enforcers, is fully worthy of contempt and animosity.

The former category are the passive resisters. It is difficult to assess the strategic soundness of the practice. To a considerable extent it has the same effect as either being brainwashed and unconscious of the deception or being inwardly supportive. When such a person enforces his or her will on another who choses to dispense with the facade and its concomitant subservience, the enforcer is wittingly practicing intellectual tyranny. As such, the active resister is obligated to accord either type of enforcer with the same hostility. We shall assume this system of responding to intellectual tyrants.

The list will be subject to modification as conditions change. We may, or may not attempt to give a full account of our reason for including a particular site. If a site is listed due to content, it should be assumed that some effort has been made to contact the maintainer in order to communicate our criticism. In the case of forums, it is almost invariably the case that moderators will not discus their motives beyond issuing a blanket decree, at most. It is quite common that insulting and aggressive behavior is accepted and even encouraged toward those of us who hold heretical views, while the same hostility is immediately and strongly rebuked when directed at anyone else. This includes any effort to respond in kind on the part of the heretic. Indeed this is the quintessential double standard.

The list of offenders follows: (We don't blame Gore personally) (especially disappointing) (good content; but some libelous defamation of good people) (mostly good content; but some libelous defamation of good people) (never explained their motives) (among the worst) (likewise) (Troll Central. Hypocrisy in the raw.) (Banned me for mentioning "Holocaust" revisionism) (see below) (A superlative example of irrational bigotry.) (Sam "Il Duce" Rapallo is the admin) (03/21/2008 - all of my contributions were deleted when I was banned.) on Common Dreams) (Where Banishment is an Honour)"I don't censor people on my forum"~Alex Jones. This is in fact not true.)

A few individuals deserve specific mention. They are "arabesque"(denies responsibility), "Col. Jenny Sparks", "truthmod" at and victronix(a pathetic liar).

Added: Thu Nov 29 16:27:03 EST 2007

[url=]Subject: Should "Holocaust Deniers" be imprisoned?[/url]

[quote="Topsy"[Forum Moderator]][quote="Colwyn Abernathy"][quote="Hetware"][quote="OrpheusOfIlion"]what about controversial genocides like the armenian genocide ? personally I don't think it can be called as genocide. but in some countries (France) holocaust denial laws has been extended to Armenian 'incident' as well. Which was done mostly to satisfy armenian voters before an election. which very immoral in my opinion.[/quote]

Geshundtheit.[/quote] :funny: :funny:

My reply which was blocked:
So the extermination of an entire branch of my family and the eradication of almost every record of their existence is funny to you? You are one sick individual!

On the following image is misscaptioned as Mass grave of civilians murdered by the Nazis in occupied USSR. Source: Berenbaum, Michael. The World Must Know. ISBN 0-316-09135-9. Page 96.

According to a close friend of mine who has family from Banat, the image appears in the hard copy of this document: The AVNOJ-Regulations and the Genocide of the Germans in Yugoslavia between 1944-1948, and the correct caption is Rudolfsgnad, Banat Serbian partisans looking into the mass grave of German civilians who had been stripped naked and gunned down en masse during the years 1944 to 1946.

For anybody who examines the image closely, it will be obvious that the caption is a "candy coating" of what is really depicted.

NB: the accounts of my friend, and that from my family are completely independent.

Justice Denied

The following was added as a comment to Justice Delayed is Justice Denied

"Justice Delayed is Justice Denied"
Tell that to my grandmother who died last year, still proud of her Sudeten German heritage. In the time of the Roman author Tacitus, the Sudetenland was part of Germania. There were no Slavs anywhere near it. All anybody could tell my aunt after the war when she tried to reestablish contact was "It was a bad place to be German."
"Justice Delayed is Justice Denied"
Tell that to my deceased grandfather whose brother CPL George M. Thomas and father Evert S. Thomas, Sr. were on Bataan and Corregidor respectively when Roosevelt stabbed them in the back, and who subsequently died as Prisoners of War.
"Justice Delayed is Justice Denied"
Tell that to 9/11 investigators Germar Rudolf and David Irving.
"Justice Delayed is Justice Denied"
Tell that to the victims of the Allied firebombings of Dresden and Tokyo
"Justice Delayed is Justice Denied"
9/11 is a little lie of history.
"Justice Delayed is Justice Denied"
Tell that to the moderators of and the stj911 forum who banned me for hinting about the longstanding injustices of history which are closely related to the 9/11/01 terrorism.
What is Truth?

Contraband Importation Agency: Tail Number N987SA

We ask a fairly simple question regarding the flights to the Guantanamo Bay Gulag. If not prisoners, what was transported to or from the facility, cocaine?

Who owned drug plane that crashed in Mexico?

By Jay Root and Kevin G. Hall | McClatchy Newspapers
Posted on Thursday, September 27, 2007

MEXICO CITY — U.S. authorities are assisting the Mexican government in the investigation of an American business jet that crashed near Cancun this week with four tons of cocaine on board, officials said Thursday.


"We're in the process of a judicial investigation that the Mexican government is conducting and we are providing information," said an embassy official, who wasn't authorized to speak on the record. "Part of that investigation is to find out more about where this plane came from and who had it before."

Some news reports have linked the plane to the transport of terrorist suspects to the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, but those reports cite logs that indicate only that the plane flew twice between Washington, D.C., and Guantanamo and once between Oxford, Conn., and Guantanamo. No terrorist suspects are known to have been transferred to Guantanamo directly from the United States.

The jet, carrying the tail number N987SA, changed hands twice in recent weeks. But how it ended up in the hands of suspected drug traffickers remains a mystery.

See also:

Gary Webb Vindicated by the Crash of N987SA

CIA Gulfstream II - N987SA

Bush Fundraiser Linked to CIA Drug Plane

Heinz, Acxiom and 9/11

Below the reader will find excerpts from an article we discovered on Strike the Root. We have not attempted to extract more than a sampling of the content, and we encourage our readers to read the entire article.

It is difficult to determine exactly how cohesively all the pieces mentioned in the article fit together. They seem worthy of attention individually, and are clearly more so if they can be shown to represent a unified model of corruption and treachery.

Why Quit, Henry? Is It Acxiom?

by Jim Rarey
When Dr. K (Kissinger) withdrew as co-chairman of the commission to investigate the 9/11 terrorist attacks after refusing to make his client list public, he bitterly asserted his consulting business represented no foreign companies or governments that would constitute a conflict of interest with his duties on the commission. Although there is no particular reason we should believe anything Kissinger says, for purposes of this article, let’s take that assertion at face value. That would mean if there is a conflict, it must be with one or more of his domestic (U.S.) clients.
Kissinger’s two consulting firms (Kissinger & Associates and Kissinger-McLarty & Associates) advise a large number of U.S. companies. Yes, it is that McLarty, Mack McLarty who was Bill Clinton’s chief of staff and is now vice-chairman of the first firm and partner in the second.
Other examples could be cited, but in this writer’s opinion, the association Dr. K is most afraid might be made public is with the little known company Acxiom.
Hardly a household name (we will try to change that), Acxiom has been selected the lead company to provide software and pull together the network to furnish the information to DARPA’s “Information Awareness Office” (IAO) where John Poindexter of Iran-Contra infamy will prepare individual dossiers on every American citizen and the millions of aliens (legal and illegal) in the country.
The plan calls for the collection of information from a staggering number of sources, such as banks, credit unions, health care organizations, the IRS and Social Security agencies, the INS, the FBI, grocery chains and any number of other companies and government agencies (federal, state and local) that have records of individual transactions.
But even this association might be covered up in these days of managed news. No, what scares Kissinger the most is the control and history of Acxiom itself. The company may be more than just a client. Mack McLarty sits on its Board of Directors, which implies some kind of investment to protect.
...Then how about its original name, Systematics? Now memories come flooding back of the PROMIS software scandal and those associated with it.

When Treasury forced Inslaw into bankruptcy (by withholding payments due Inslaw) ownership of the software wound up with a CIA cutout named the Hadron Corp. Hadron peddled the software to governments and financial institutions around the world, thus giving the CIA backdoor access to the secret information of a number of governments and banks.
...Acxiom/Alltel/Systematics is Arkansas billionaire Jackson Stephens. ...
At Systematics, one of the lawyers Stephens hired to represent the company was a bright young attorney named Hillary Rodham. ... Hillary, Vince Foster and Webster Hubbell ...
Stephens was a financial angel to both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. ...
Another scandal suppressed by the “watchdogs of the press” was the cocaine smuggling aspects of the Iran/Contra affair.
...Contras in Nicaragua, cocaine ... dropped off at a small airport at Mena, Arkansas. Pilot Barry Seal, a CIA asset and drug runner, ... dropping bales of cash in Mena. The drug money was laundered ... through Stephen’s Worthen bank and an ... agency set up by Governor Bill Clinton (the Arkansas Development Finance Authority). ...[T]hen Vice-President George H.W. Bush, ... Caspar Weinberger.
A partner with Stephens ... Mochtar Riady, one of the principals in the Indonesian Lippo Group. ... campaign financing scandals of the second Clinton presidential campaign, with links to the Chinese military.
The Bank of Commerce and Credit International (BCCI) ... became a repository and laundering channel for a broad spectrum of organizations, including the terrorists as well as[sic] Mossad and the CIA.
Later, Assistant District Attorney Robert Morgenthau in New York launched a comprehensive investigation into BCCI until it was shut down by Robert Mueller in the Department of Justice (now FBI Director) and Mary Jo White, Clinton-appointed U.S. Attorney for the southern district of New York. White was held over by George W. Bush long enough to deep six the investigation of Clinton’s pardon of Marc Rich. ...

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

General Benton K. Partin on OKC and TWA 800

We don't agree with everything General Partin has to say in this video. Nonetheless, his technical expertise certainly qualifies him to speak with authority on the evidence he examines.

Meet the Real al Qaeda

Witnesses testified about terrorist groups using the Internet to recruit and radicalize their followers. Topics included illustrations of propaganda used on Internet sites, instructions for making bombs, the role of al-Qaeda, appealing to young people, counterterrorism through positive sites, and other solutions.

The counterterrorists are the terrorists. The real al Qaeda consists of those we find testifying before Congress.

Saturday, November 10, 2007

Top-down Controlled Demolition

It is often argued by defenders of the 9/11 OCT(official conspiracy theory) that all controlled demolitions proceed from the bottom up. This short video puts the lie to that contention in a mere 29 seconds

Friday, November 02, 2007

Searching for the Zionist Conspiracy

The expression Zionist conspiracy has long been used as a derisive retort to deflect criticism of Zionist policies and practices. The implication is that a person who criticizes Zionism or Zionists is a paranoid, delusional conspiracist. We offer our reader the following list of Internet searches so that he or she might explore a bit about the individuals and organizations which are either overtly Zionist, or have been labeled as Zionist by their critics. We leave to the reader the conclusion as to whether the evidence revealed indicates a conspiracy.'nai+B'rith'am'ev+Jabotinsky